Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Lawyers Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Lawyers
Practice Areas: Climate Change Law
Home
Practice Areas
News to Use
Recruiting
DWT in the Community
Seminars & Training
Bookstore
Lawyer Directory
Office Locations
Search & Site Map
Introduction to DWT's Climate Change Practice

At DWT, our attorneys have an in-depth understanding of the rapidly evolving climate change policies at the international, national and state levels, along with extensive experience in the fields of energy, environmental and business law. This expertise enables us to offer clients top-quality advice and counseling on climate change regulatory risk, the sale and purchase of greenhouse gas credits/offsets, and commercial law aspects of opportunities related to climate change. We also have the means to assist clients in helping to shape the greenhouse regulatory system in the United States. continue reading

Department Members


Portland
Richard M. Glick
Peter A. Sergienko

San Francisco
Thomas J. Cervantez
Josh Davidson
Allison A. Davis
Robert B. Gex
Jeffrey Gray
Steven F. Greenwald
James P. Walsh

Seattle
David A. Domansky
Craig Gannett
Patricia Thompson

Washington, D.C.
Daniel M. Adamson
Barbara S. Jost


 

Climate Change Practice Co-Chairs



Dan Adamson Allison Davis
Dan Adamson Allison Davis

Related Practice Areas



Representative Matters


DWT currently advises a number of electric utilities and generators regarding greenhouse gas regulatory and policy matters. DWT has also assisted clients with numerous transactions involving greenhouse gas offsets. continue reading

Contact Us


Email us your comments and suggestions or call us toll-free at 1-877-398-8416. We'd love to hear from you!

 

Articles, Publications & Presentations


Reality Bites: California GHG Plan
By Steven F. Greenwald and Jeffrey P. Gray
Published by Power
Magazine [August 2008]
   
Climate Change: Policy via Litigation
By Steven F. Greenwald and Jeffrey P. Gray
Published by Power
Magazine [July 2008]
   
The Green Trade-Off
By Steven F. Greenwald and Jeffrey P. Gray
Published by Power Magazine [June 2008]
   
Dan Adamson was a featured presenter on
“D.C. Overview On Climate Change Legislation” at the 12th Annual Mid-C Seminar
July 23, 2008 Wenatchee, Washington
   
Thursday, Nov 8, 2007 -- 7:37 AM, KQED public radio's Perspectives program Not So Climate Smart -- Davis Wright Tremaine's Steve Greenwald says a PG&E program that lets customers buy climate neutral status without actually doing anything is a bad deal.

 
Carbon-Neutral Status Shouldn't be for Sale
By Steven F. Greenwald
Published by ClimateBiz
[November 20, 2007]
 
AB 32 - One Year Later
By Jeffrey P. Gray and Steven F. Greenwald
Published by EnergyPulse
[October 2007]
 

Global Warming & the Effects on Environmental Law
Presentation by Dan Adamson

The Seminar Group
Portland, Oregon [September 26-27, 2007]

   

Carbon-Neutral Status Shouldn't be for Sale
By Steven F. Greenwald and Jeffrey P. Gray
Published by Power Magazine [September 2007]

   

Sacramento Scrambles for Climate Change, CEQA Solution
Published by California Real Estate Journal
[September 10, 2007]

   

The Bumpy Road to Federal CO2 Caps
Craig Gannett and Dan Adamson
Published by Power Magazine [July 2007]

   

Regional Responses to Global Climate Change
Peter Sergienko
Published by Northwest Reports [June 2007]
Northwest Food Processors Association

   

Led by California and New England, Governors and environmental officials from 34 states (representing 75% of the U.S.), two Canadian provinces and an tribal nation have formed the Climate Registry to track emissions from corporations, municipalities and other groups. The Climate Registry is a multi-state and tribe collaboration aimed at developing and managing a common greenhouse gas emissions reporting system. The Climate Registry will begin accepting data in January 2008.

   
Supreme Court Rebukes EPA on Climate Change Regulation [April 2007]
   
Climate Change Legislation: Major Policy Issues Before Congress [Feb. 2007]
   
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Releases Much-Anticipated Report [Feb. 2007]
   
Proposed CPUC Decision Establishes Interim Greenhouse Gas Emissions Performance Standard [Dec. 2006]
   
Global Warming In The Courts: An Overview of Current Litigation and Common Legal Issues
By Justin R. Pidot of Georgetown Environmental Law & Policy Institute, Georgetown University Law Center
   
Senate Democrats Write Bush on Climate Change
   

California Passes Landmark Legislation to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions

 
View California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006
   

Global Warming Reaches the Supreme Court

   
Davis Wright Tremaine Forms Climate Change Practice Group


DWT's Climate Change Practice

The effort to control greenhouse gas emissions as a means of addressing climate change could become one of the most significant regulatory developments of the 21st century. The regulation of greenhouse gases (GHG) is likely to be pervasive, producing profound effects throughout the U.S. economy in many fields including energy production and consumption, manufacturing, transportation and construction.

In the wake of the U.S. decision to not join the Kyoto Protocol on climate change, there is no federal system to regulate greenhouse gas emissions. However, countries across the globe―as well as individual states, regions and cities―are in the process of adopting or implementing a wide range of systems to limit these emissions. Most observers believe that establishment of a climate change regulatory regime at our federal level is nearly inevitable by 2010, in light of the regulatory systems that have been established at other levels of government and the growing public concern about climate change.

The prospect of climate change regulation creates a series of risks and opportunities for U.S. companies. It will produce tremendous growth in investment in low-emission technologies and processes. On the other hand, operating costs are likely to increase in certain energy-intensive sectors of the economy. There is also the significant challenge of devising a method for allocating the costs of regulation among different sectors of the economy and regions of the country.

In response to these emerging issues, our firm has formed a climate change practice group to advise and assist companies on business, transactional, regulatory and policy matters related to climate change.

Examples of our climate change work:

  • Advising utilities on the potential impact of future federal greenhouse gas regulation on their electric generation assets, with recommendations regarding mitigation of the risks
  • Advising an independent power producer on market structure issues related to California’s adoption of greenhouse gas regulations
  • Representing the entity responsible for acquiring carbon offsets with funds from developers of fossil fuel-fired facilities under Oregon’s energy facility siting law
  • Representing an independent power producer in the California Public Utility Commission proceeding establishing a greenhouse gas emission performance standard for long-term power procurement by California utilities
  • Advising a state governmental agency on the impact of GHG legislation on its contracting for power supply
  • Advising an international corporation regarding the development of GHG reduction offsets in China through utilization of the Clean Development Mechanism under the Kyoto Protocol


Our firm also has an extensive transactional and regulatory practice in the renewable energy field, which is relevant to policies such as renewable portfolio standards that have been adopted by some states―in part as a means of reducing future greenhouse gas emissions.

 

 


Return to top of page

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP
Home | Practice Areas | News To Use | Recruiting | DWT in the Community
Seminars & Training | Bookstore | Lawyer Directory | Office Locations | Search & Site Map
Davis Wright Tremaine LLP Davis Wright Tremaine LLP