
Over the last 20 years, the legal issues affecting employee benefits
have become much more complex. The laws and regulations governing
pension and profit sharing plans, Section 401(k) plans, deferred
compensation, health, life, disability and other retirement and
welfare plans continue to change as Congress struggles to balance
the competing goals of social policy and revenue enhancement. Expensive
litigation over pension rights, retiree health benefits, severance
pay, withdrawal liability, disallowed deductions, and age and sex
discrimination grows constantly.
In this fast changing, highly technical environment, quality
legal advice is an essential part of overall benefits planning.
Davis Wright Tremaine, with one of the largest and most experienced
Employee Benefits Practice Groups on the West Coast, helps companies
of all sizes design and implement successful plans, ensure compliance
with constantly changing laws and answer the difficult questions
that always arise. This practice group works closely with lawyers
in the firm's well-known Employment Law Department on issues that
overlap both fields and with our office in Washington, D.C.
|


Help Make Your Company's Retirement Plan More Litigation-Proof
Speakers:
Jason T. Froggatt and
Sarah L. Bhagwandin
May 29, 2008 - Seattle, WA
Please join Davis Wright Tremaine and The Retirement Plan Advisors for a seminar on making your company's retirement plan more litigation proof. The seminar will be held on Thursday, May 29th from 9:00 to 11:00 a.m. in the DWT Seattle office. For more information click here.
|
|

Visit our Employer Services home
page to see the latest Employee Benefits, Employment Law and
Immigration advisory bulletins, seminars, useful weblinks
and much more!

For more information, please contact Jeff
Belfiglio toll-free at 1-877-398-8416,
jeffbelfiglio@dwt.com.
We'd love to hear from you!
The purpose of our website is
to inform our clients and friends about the firm and of recent
legal developments in Employee Benefits law. It is not intended
nor should it be used as a substitute for specific legal advice
or opinions since legal counsel may be given only in response
to inquiries regarding particular situations. Internet subscribers
and online readers should not act upon this information without
seeking professional counsel.
|
|