Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Desktop Image: Accorsi, Sancho
Mobile Image: Accorsi, Sancho

Sancho Accorsi

Associate

T 213.633.8625 Los Angeles
  •  

Download vCard Download bio Print this page
Share

Sancho Accorsi focuses on high-stakes, complex commercial litigation with an emphasis on class actions. He has been recognized for notable wins in:

  • Valenzuela v. The Kroger Co., 2025 WL 851075 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2025), featured in Law360's Legal Lions of the Week (here)
  • Heinz v. Amazon.com, Inc., 2024 WL 5304886 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 18, 2024), covered by Law 360 (here)
  • Navarro v. Ski Data, 2022 WL 18280359 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2022), featured in Daily Journal Top Verdicts of 2022 (here)

Sancho represents a range of clients, including household names in the food and beverage, financial services, healthcare, technology, and telecommunications industries. He regularly defends clients against claims related to digital privacy, business contracts, false advertising, product labeling, antitrust and unfair competition, and others.

Sancho advocates for his clients through all stages of litigation, from motions practice to discovery, depositions, and appeals. He has extensive experience in legal research and writing, including winning dispositive motions and appellate briefs.

Before joining DWT, Sancho clerked for the Hon. Christina A. Snyder of the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California.

Practice Highlights

Class-action defense

Experienced in defending clients across industries against class actions concerning digital privacy, false advertising, banking regulations, and other issues.

Complex privacy litigation

Recognized for significant wins against privacy class actions, including under the California Invasion of Privacy Act, Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, and Stored Communications Act.

Financial services litigation

Experienced in representing financial services clients across a host of litigation, including class actions and statutory or regulatory claims.

Antitrust

Represents clients in antitrust disputes and advises companies on antitrust risk and compliance.

Valenzuela v. The Kroger Co.

Won dismissal of putative class action alleging The Kroger Co. violated the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA) by aiding its webchat vendor to "eavesdrop" on customer-service webchats. Won dismissal on novel ground that the plaintiff failed to allege Kroger intended to aid in eavesdropping. No. CV 22-6382-DMG (AGRX), 2025 WL 851075 (C.D. Cal. Mar. 13, 2025). Featured in Law360's Legal Lions of the Week (here) and other industry publications (here).

Heinz v. Amazon.com, Inc.

Won dismissal of putative class action alleging Amazon.com Inc. violated CIPA by aiding its webchat vendor to "eavesdrop" on customer-service webchats. Won transfer by enforcing forum-selection clause in Amazon's Conditions of Use (COUs), No. 2:23-CV-00282 WBS AC, 2023 WL 4466904 (E.D. Cal. July 11, 2023), won application of Washington law by enforcing choice-of-law provision in COUs, No. 2:23-CV-1073, 2024 WL 2091108 (W.D. Wash. May 8, 2024), and won dismissal under Washington wiretapping statutes. No. C24-714RSM, 2024 WL 5304886 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 18, 2024). Covered by Law 360 (here).

Other CIPA wins

  • Cody v. Ring LLC, No. 23-CV-00562-AMO, 2025 WL 240763 (N.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2025) (dismissing putative class action alleging website violated CIPA through its chatbot)
  • Licea v. Vitacost.com, Inc., 683 F. Supp. 3d 1118 (S.D. Cal. 2023) (dismissing putative class action alleging website violated CIPA through its chatbot)

Navarro v. Ski Data

Represented Park Assist LLC in a putative class action alleging parking assistance technology violated state privacy laws, including California's Automated License Plate Recognition (ALPR) statute. Plaintiffs sought statutory penalties for every individual who parked at Southern California's largest malls for a four-year period, threatening potential liability of over $1 billion. Won summary judgment finding Park Assist was not an "operator" subject to the ALPR law, the ALPR law contains a harm requirement, and plaintiffs failed to adduce evidence of harm. No. 2:20-CV-07370-SVW-SK, 2022 WL 18280359 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2022). Featured in Daily Journal Top Verdicts of 2022 (here).

Vitort v. The Kroger Co.

Represented The Kroger Co. in putative class action alleging false or misleading advertising, winning dismissal affirmed on appeal. No. 3:20-CV-01317-AC, 2022 WL 294904 (D. Or. Feb. 1, 2022), aff'd, No. 22-35185, 2023 WL 3143690 (9th Cir. Apr. 28, 2023)

Searching...

Admitted to Practice

  • California, 2019
  • U.S. District Court, Central District of California, 2021
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of California, 2023
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, 2024
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of California, 2022
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 2023

Education

  • J.D., Stanford Law School, 2019
    • John Hart Ely Prize
    • Co-President, Criminal Law Society
    • Stanford Latino Law Students Association
    • Stanford International Law Journal
  • B.A., International Relations, Brown University, 2010, magna cum laude
    • Phi Beta Kappa
    • S.C. Rosenberger Prize
    • Brown Journal of World Affairs
    • Honors in International Relations

Professional Recognition

    • Named "One to Watch" by Best Lawyers in Commercial Litigation, 2025

Background

    • Law Clerk, Hon. Christina A. Snyder, U.S. District Court, Central District of California, Los Angeles, 2020-2021
    • Associate, Manatt, Phelps and Phillips, LLP, Los Angeles, 2019-2020
    • Extern, Criminal Division, United States Attorney's Office, Central District of California, Los Angeles, 2017
    • Dean and Special Education Teacher, Endeavor College Preparatory School, Lincoln Heights, 2010-2014
    • Corps Member, Teach for America, Los Angeles, 2010-2012
Searching...
Publications
08.15.24
News
2025 Edition of Best Lawyers Recognizes More Than 180 Davis Wright Tremaine Attorneys for Excellence Read More
Publications
05.09.24
News
"Amazon Shakes Wash. Suit Premised On Calif. Wiretap Claims," Law360 Read More External Link
Publications
02.15.23
News
Class Action Defense
Daily Journal Names Class Action Win by Davis Wright Tremaine One of the Top Verdicts of 2022 Read More
Publications
02.15.23
News
Class Action Defense
"Top Verdicts - Navarro vs. Park Assist LLC, et al.," Los Angeles and San Francisco Daily Journal Read More
Your search returned no results. Please try another search or remove search criteria.
DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO

SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.