Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Desktop Image: Donahue, Hannah
Mobile Image: Donahue, Hannah

Hannah Donahue

She/Her

Associate

T 213.655.9674 Los Angeles
M 213.304.7543
  •  

Download vCard Download bio Print this page
Share

Hannah Donahue is a member of the firm's technology, communications, privacy and security practice group. Together with other members of the DWT communications group, Hannah assists communications clients with California regulatory compliance and the development and advocacy of policy positions in rulemaking proceedings.

Hannah attended LMU Loyola Law School, where she completed a concentration in Cybersecurity & Data Privacy with honors. Hannah also served on the executive board of the Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review as the Chief Technical Editor. Prior to practicing law, Hannah was an advertising media strategist and filmmaker.

Admitted to Practice

  • California

Education

  • J.D., Cybersecurity & Data Privacy, Loyola Law School, Los Angeles, 2022, with honors
    • Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review, Chief Technical Editor (May 2021-May 2022); Staff (August 2020-May 2021)
  • B.A., Communication Studies, University of California, Los Angeles, 2015

Memberships & Affiliations

    • Named "One to Watch" by Best Lawyers in Communications Law, 2025
    • Fellow, Internet Law & Policy Foundry, 2022-2024
    • Federal Communications Bar Association, 2020-present

Background

    • Legal Fellow, Wikimedia Foundation, 2022, San Francisco (remote)
    • Research Assistant for Lauren E. Willis, Associate Dean for Research, Professor of Law, and William M. Rains Fellow, LMU Loyola Law School, 2020–2022, Los Angeles
    • Legal Intern, Electronic Frontier Foundation, 2021, San Francisco (remote)
    • Legal Intern, Office of the General Counsel, Federal Communications Commission, 2021, Washington, D.C. (remote)
    • Summer Legal Intern, Inland Counties Legal Services, 2020, Riverside, Calif. (remote)
Searching...
Publications
02.14.25
Publications
Co-author, "Commentary: Relying On Loper Bright's Elimination Of Chevron Deference, Sixth Circuit Reverses FCC And Holds That Internet Service Is An Information Service Under The Communications Act," Mealey's Litigation Report Read More
fiberoptic light
01.09.25
Insights
6th Circuit Invalidates FCC's 2024 Network Neutrality Order Read More
Globe at night with communication lights
11.08.24
Insights
FCC Issues NOI on Broadband Data Caps Read More
Publications
08.15.24
News
2025 Edition of Best Lawyers Recognizes More Than 180 Davis Wright Tremaine Attorneys for Excellence Read More
Globe at night with communication lights
06.13.24
Insights
FCC Proposes Reporting and Other Obligations To Secure Routing of Internet Traffic Read More
San Francisco Street Trolley
08.23.23
Insights
Waymo and Cruise Receive CPUC Authorizations to Collect Fares for Autonomous Vehicle Rides in San Francisco Read More
Publications
Spring 2023
Publications
Privacy & Security
"Financial Incentives: The Fault in California's Privacy Framework," Loyola of Los Angeles Law Review Read More External Link
Publications
09.22.21
Publications
Privacy & Security
Co-author, "Colorado Supreme Court Rules Three Months of Warrantless Video Surveillance Violates the Constitution," Deeplinks Blog, Electronic Frontier Foundation Read More External Link
Publications
09.21.2021
Publications
Co-author, "Colorado Supreme Court Rules Three Months of Warrantless Video Surveillance Violates the Constitution," Deeplinks Blog: Electronic Frontier Foundation Read More External Link
Your search returned no results. Please try another search or remove search criteria.
DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO

SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.