Skip to content
DWT logo
People Services Insights
About Offices Careers
Search
People
Services
Insights
About
Offices
Careers
Search
Desktop Image: Christine
Mobile Image: Christine

Christine C. Hawkins

Counsel

T 425.646.6112 Bellevue
  •  

Download vCard Download bio Print this page
Share

Christine Hawkins advises clients on a wide range of employee benefits and ERISA compliance matters, including plan drafting, fiduciary governance, plan corrections, ACA reporting, ERISA litigation, COBRA, government audits, 409A arrangements, and fringe benefit programs.

Christine works with a wide range of companies, including hospitals, banks, airlines, government agencies, and nonprofit organizations. Her experience covers qualified plans, including 403(b) and 401(k) plans, nonqualified top hat and incentive plans, and health and welfare plans.

Litigation

Service Employees International Union Healthcare 1199NW v. Snohomish County Public District No.1 d/b/a EvergreenHealth Monroe

Christine successfully represented EvergreenHealth in a union suit alleging failure to make timely employer matching contributions to the EvergreenHealth 401(a) plan. After a series of motions, the case was dismissed with prejudice. DWT is currently responding to the union's appeal.

Johnson, et al. v. Carpenters of Western Washington Board of Trustees

In a case of first impression after the Supreme Court's decision in Thole v. U.S. Bank, Christine represented members of the Board of Trustees for indemnification from the trust for the cost of defense and liability for an alleged fiduciary breach. The Court ruled in favor of the individual trustees and required the trust to indemnify and advance the cost of defense. The Court's decision was a complete victory for the trustee defendants on their claim for indemnification and attorneys' fees.

Pacific Bells, et al. v. Inslee

In a case of first impression, Christine represented a class of employers and employees challenging the WA Cares Act as void and unenforceable. The case forced the state legislature to make substantive changes to the WA Cares Act and to delay the effective date of the Act by 18 months, which saved employees approximately $1.5 billion in payroll taxes. The case was ultimately dismissed at the federal level for lack of jurisdiction, but the case may be refiled in state court to challenge the constitutionality of the state tax on employees' wages.

N.F. v. Premera Blue Cross

Christine represented Microsoft and the Microsoft health plan against a plan participant claiming wrongful denial of benefits. Microsoft prevailed on a motion for summary judgment at the district court level.

B.H. v. Microsoft

Christine represented Microsoft and the Microsoft health plan in reaching settlement with a plan participant claiming wrongful denial of benefits.
Searching...

Admitted to Practice

  • Washington, 2011
  • U.S. District Court, Western District of Washington, 2014
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit, 2015

Education

  • LL.M., Taxation, University of Florida Levin College of Law, 2012
    • Graduate Assistant, Professor Patricia Dilley
  • J.D., Seattle University School of Law, 2011, magna cum laude
  • B.A., Colgate University, 2008, cum laude

Memberships & Affiliations

    • Membership Chair, Seattle Chapter, Western Pension & Benefits Council, 2023-present
    • Trustee, Little Bit Therapeutic Riding Center, Redmond, Wash., 2017-present
    • President, Governing Board, Western Pension & Benefits Council, 2021-2022
    • President, Seattle Chapter, Western Pension & Benefits Council, 2019-2021
    • Board Member, King County Washington Women Lawyers, 2014-2016

Professional Recognition

    • Listed among "Associates to Watch" by Chambers USA in Employee Benefits & Executive Compensation (Washington), 2021-2024
    • Named "One to Watch" by Best Lawyers in Employee Benefits (ERISA) Law, 2021-2025
    • Selected to "Washington Rising Stars," Thomson Reuters, 2021-2022
Searching...
03.25.25
Presentations
Speaker, "2025 ERISA Litigation Update," Employee Benefits Client Seminar, Davis Wright Tremaine, Seattle
Stacks of paperwork
03.11.25
Insights
New Guidance Issued on Mandatory and Optional Catch-Up Provisions Under SECURE 2.0 Read More
01.29.25
Presentations
Speaker, "SECURE 2.0 Hits and Misses," Western Pension & Benefits Council Webinar
Publications
08.15.24
News
2025 Edition of Best Lawyers Recognizes More Than 180 Davis Wright Tremaine Attorneys for Excellence Read More
Publications
06.10.24
News
New Chambers Rankings Affirm Davis Wright Tremaine's National Leadership in Key Industry Sectors Read More
Dollars and cents
05.29.24
Insights
Counseling
Excessive Fees or Incessant Litigation – Time for Legislative and Employer Action on Retirement Plans! Read More
03.20.24
Presentations
Speaker, "2024 ERISA Litigation Update," Employee Benefits Client Seminar, Davis Wright Tremaine, Seattle
State of Washington
02.27.24
Insights
Counseling
Washington Employers Now Have Greater Access to PFML Leave Information for Employees Read More
Dollar bill
08.29.23
Insights
Counseling
IRS Delays SECURE 2.0 Roth Requirement for Catch-up Contributions Until 2026 Read More
Publications
08.17.23
News
2024 Edition of Best Lawyers Recognizes More Than 175 Davis Wright Tremaine Attorneys for Excellence Read More
Publications
06.05.23
News
Chambers USA Recognizes Davis Wright Tremaine for Leadership Across Key Industry Sectors and Honors the Firm for Excellence in 51 Practices Read More
Welcome to Washington The Evergreen State sign
05.23.23
Insights
Washington
Who is Caring for WA Cares? Part 3: Unconstitutional Income Tax or Excise Tax? Read More
Your search returned no results. Please try another search or remove search criteria.
DWT logo
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.
Media Kit Affiliations Legal notices
Privacy policy Employees DWT Collaborate EEO

SUBSCRIBE
©1996-2025 Davis Wright Tremaine LLP. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. Attorney Advertising. Not intended as legal advice. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome.